You will learn that from the recent cases, courts actually maintained a ban on businesses contributing unlimited funds to campaigns. It is certain that about 90% of Americans want the role of money in politics to be checked. This is why so many people have been eagerly waiting for this ruling on whether corporates will be allowed to contribute in future. It is evident that not all will appreciate the decision that the Supreme Court has chosen to go for. They chose not to consider removing the ban on campaign finance. As you go on reading, you will discover more about why this ruling was taken into account.
It is important for us to start with understanding that nothing new took place in the court. The Supreme Court simply chose to not to consider the challenges to the current campaign finance laws. As such, no corporate will be free to donate their money to campaigns or even candidates. This decision has resulted in curtailing the ballooning role of corporates in the political field. You will find that in previous instances, corporates has the room to donate to campaign kitties from time to time. This would often be allowed if the money is not tied to a particular individual. You will witness that this case was actually brought about by two companies that come from Massachusetts. This case was purposed to enhance financial responsibility and even economic opportunities. It will actually be more prudent for you to consider a good lawyer in case of such a big case.
Seek to ensure that you are familiarized with the legal argument in this case. You will note that these companies intimated that the first amendment rights of companies was being overlooked. The argument was based on the fact that political donations were components of freedom of speech. They also appealed to the constitution which indicates the need to equally protect each individual. It is evident that nonprofit as well as charity organizations are not allowed to finance any of these political campaigns. This in itself shows that corporate entities are receiving preferential treatment. This does conflict what the constitution basically stands for.
It is necessary to mention that the ruling of the High Court was upheld. This ruling claimed that corporates are not allowed to donate money to political campaigns. This is because it could easily lead to corruption in politics. This means that all political candidates will be forbidden from accepting such donations from various corporations.
